How Microsoft Screwed-up

In an interview with Check Point’s CEO.

Why do you think it’s been so challenging for Microsoft to get its arms around security?

My view, as a technologist, is very simple. Go back 20 years or so, in terms of the operating system. There were Unix and VMS. Unix was extremely simple, extremely powerful and easy to master. You could have gone to the Unix kernel and made changes and introduced new applications. Every Unix programmer knew all the APIs (application user interfaces), because they were very simple.

The VMS approach was the opposite. Everything you wanted to do was available there. It was very, very powerful but extremely complicated. Everything was a big bureaucracy. For everything you wanted to do, you needed to read 50 pages or 100 pages of manuals to learn how to do it. Microsoft historically picked the VMS approach. It actually hired the same guy who was in charge of VMS development.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

A note to our visitors

This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with changes to European Union data protection law, for all members globally. We’ve also updated our Privacy Policy to give you more information about your rights and responsibilities with respect to your privacy and personal information. Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated privacy policy.

Scroll to Top